#298 documents four. One lie you tried to weasel when cornered. Two remain unanswered, and there's clear instance of purposeful libel in taking me out of context. #377 documents two more.
And of course you're still lying in defense of Russian hackers
Basic logic check here. How is it a defense to say they're subject to massive civil penalties, just not criminal?
claims that other Russian hackers were writing software for the US DoD, something you were called on immediately but didn't admit for months.
WOW!!! This is incredible. What you just said was a lie I caught you on, documented in #298. You later admitted mistake after being pressured for days and cornered. Now you bring it up again? If I was caught on it, produce the link to the post. Otherwise, immediately admit another lie by you. You definitely can't claim "mistake" again on this one.
You still can't articulate a single time I supposedly lied, on purpose, when you are already on record outright admitting you knowingly did so for months in defense of Russian hackers. #298 is just a documented history of your first admission of your first batch of lies, yet you claim they are somehow mine? LMAO.
"Yes, I lied" - admitted by AntiRepublican - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1724347/posts?page=88#88
So you have already admitted to lying on behalf of illegal Russian hacking, but you have continued it further since you have been insisting it could not have been a criminal offense for months, claiming that OSX had to be distributed and not just the hack, which has been shown on this thread to be another lie.
"Simply violating a license by not abiding by the terms is a civil tort, not a crime, thus, no criminals. It could be come a crime had they copied OS X itself and widely sold it.." http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1724347/posts?page=119#119
You now claim you support software patents, a 180 from your known position, and that you don't ever defend the radical leftist Richard Stallman, when in fact we know you come running to his defense like a starved man who just heard the dinner bell ring. Get a load of this BS, especially in light of your new lies you now magically support software patents and don't defend Stallman LOL:
"I said Stallman doesn't want patent laws overturned...he's only against software patents...There is no evidence that Stallman is against all patents...I do agree that software patents are harmful...Software patents make software development a minefield..." - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1527747/posts?page=113#113
You also had this to say about Apple OSX on that same thread:
"Mac OS X is essentially a highly-polished turd." http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1527747/posts?page=49#49
Basic logic? Obviously you have none, nor do you have any basic honesty. Of course you're defending them, you might as well be their lawyer, trying to get the criminal charges dropped, so you can then find some loophole in the civil case. It's bad enough to be far out on limb defending illegal hacking by Russians, but then pile lie after lie after lie on top, and you're far past proving you're ripe to be strung up yourself.