You're putting words in my mouth again. I said you were wrong for calling it criminal because the facts that we have show no activity that would qualify them for criminal prosecution. As I said, you can make up facts that would qualify them, but those weren't in the article. IOW, you call them criminal with no real factual basis, which is -- per your MO -- libel.
you're the one who outright admitted they knowingly and purposefully lied
And you keep denying your proven lies. Who's more honest?
LMAO, obviously I am, since you have already outright admitted you knowingly and purposefully lied, for months, in defense of the Russian hackers' illegal activities. You haven't proven I have ever lied knowingly or purposefully, and most every time you try it just ends up being more of your endless lies, just as we have seen on this thread.