You said that I said "copyright cases can't be criminal." I said copyright cases can be civil and/or criminal. I NEVER said copyright cases can't be criminal -- I said THIS copyright case can't be criminal according to the information we have.
That is a lie and libel against me. You bear false witness.
You said that I said "distributing the crack and not the copyrighted material wasn't breaking copyright law." I actually said it didn't qualify for criminal penalties IN THIS CASE. I never said it wasn't breaking copyright law. As you saw me post in #376, it likely breaks Section 1201 of the DMCA, and the author is likely subject to civil liability for it.
That is a another lie and libel against me. You again bear false witness.
Now which commandment was it that you broke several times in this thread, twice in that one post? I believe it was number nine (or eight, depending on your denomination).
More lies, of which there will be no end, since you've already outright admitted in this very thread you lie in defense of foreign criminals quote "for fun".