I caught you on that many, many posts ago using, BTW, your own links. You read the links before I did, you did the research for me. Claiming forgetfulness now does not gain you any credibility. You only say this because you're backed into a corner.
it's not like I purposefully made up a lie and continued it for months
No, you just lied and continued this lie several times in this thread after I caught you on it and kept reminding you and your buddy of it. And, unlike you, I have proof that I caught you, and you did not admit it of your own volition -- you were forced to admit.
it's not like I purposefully made up a lie and continued it for months, just so I could run cover for criminal Russian hackers
It was making fun of your paranoia. If those hackers are caught and sued and have to pay, then so be it -- they are in all likelihood pretty bad guys anyway (although for anyone else, I do have reservations regarding our legal right to fair use). However, contrary to your assertions, they are not criminal because their actions are, according to our laws, not criminal. When faced with these laws you just blew it off and later continued your lies.
In fact, you've been running that "criminal" lie for some months too. And I caught you on it, and you still refuse to recant.
LOL you haven't "caught" me on anything, you simply continued your endless defense of the Russian hackers just as you are doing now. Copyright infringement can obviously be criminal, if the value estimated to be lost reaches certain levels, and giving ways for OSX to be cracked internationally could certainly qualify. Just because these guys haven't been extradited to the US doesn't mean their activity isn't criminal, we know you're going to defend them even with lies to your last dying breath LOL but to claim facilitating mass copyright infringement can't be criminal is absurd, and just the sort of BS you're known for.