See you're missing the point again. A) You admitted to lying for months to trap GE B) I can't trust you C) The marriage analogy is dead-on as you already ADMITTED to lying and now you're just trying to say GE lied too look at this post. I guess you buy the Clinton's "Everyone lies about sex excuse". To you it's everyone lies on conservative discussion borads. Take your lying arse out of here. And that's not name calling as you already admitted to lying for months.
You don't have to. You only have to read and attempt to refute #298. If you can't refute it, then admit your bias in supporting an unconfessed liar who continues his lies in this very thread.
The marriage analogy is dead-on as you already ADMITTED to lying
You're getting close to comprehension. Exactly, I "already ADMITTED." How can you get "caught" (as you and GE claim) on something when you ADMIT it first? You can't, it's illogical. You can admit, then people can complain about what you did, but you can't get "caught."
you're just trying to say GE lied too look at this post
You seem to trust him. You trusted his statement that he caught me on the "lie," yet that statement is proven false in #298. That is in addition to me proving that one of the quotes he used to convince you is taken completely out of context and is thus a false accusation against me. It's all there, linked to proof, in plain text. Again, no need to believe me. The straight timeline of the exchange itself shows two blatant lies. He's had over a day to say "Oops, got the timeline wrong," but he prefers to continue rants and attacks instead.
That post shows why you shouldn't trust him, as he has lied multiple times about the very case on which you are basing your opinion. The logical conclusion from this is that your opinion, being based on lies, is faulty.
To you it's everyone lies on conservative discussion borads
To all of us, it's "GE always lies, the rest of us just have fun at his expense due to the constant frustration of dealing with him and his lies."
Is GE paying you or something? You are the only one I can remember who has ever come to the defense of his lies. Bush2000 argued on the same side of certain subjects as GE, and against us, but he was rational and truthful.