When are facts a defense? I guess they can be considered that when used to counter lies. First you called them criminal, with absolutely no proof of it. Second, not all countries allow the anti-consumer clauses in licenses. You buy it, you can run it on whatever you want. They did not distribute OS X, just found a way to put it on a non-Mac PC -- legal in countries with strong consumer laws. In fact, that clause hasn't even been tested in the US yet, so we don't know if it's enforceable here.
defense of Green Party leftist Richard Stalllman
Again, I didn't defend him, I don't even like him. However, when you start spouting lies about his positions on subjects, they need to be corrected.
More obvious lies, you rush to defend that crackpot leftist constantly, just like the Russian hackers you're still trying to make excuses for. You're no more credible than the scumbags you so diligently defend, as the record clearly shows.