Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
If Microsoft wants to impress me, allow a full Exchange cluster, and have it use an SQL Server cluster as the back-end. Then both the data and the application will be in full failover.

This shows how little you know about Exchange and SQL. using SQL for a bunch of small messages would yield much lower performance. JET Blue isn't exactly Access, but it is close enough for comparisons. Having said that what makes Access a bad database is a strength for messaging (once modified).

I understand Microsoft looked at using SQL for exchange and it just couldn't pump the messages out quick enough. Completely different technology. Just because SQL makes a great database doesn't make it a great email server.

139 posted on 01/05/2007 11:05:20 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: for-q-clinton
This shows how little you know about Exchange and SQL. using SQL for a bunch of small messages would yield much lower performance. I understand Microsoft looked at using SQL for exchange and it just couldn't pump the messages out quick enough. Completely different technology. Just because SQL makes a great database doesn't make it a great email server.

Exactly correct, these guys are programmers and maybe great at that but know little about system management. To listen to them everyone should rip out our Windows servers which we already know through experience are easier to manage and put in eight flavors of *nix and spend all day hammering out incompatibilities at the core level instead.

171 posted on 01/05/2007 4:50:09 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson