[Wallace T.]

Neither you nor your fellow "gay rights" advocates have given any answers to the questions I have posed in my last thread and other postings over the last couple of days:

* Was pre-1960 America, where homosexual sodomy was illegal in all states, a union of 50 authoritarian theocracies similar to present day Iran or Saudi Arabia?
* Do governments have any justification for restricting sexual freedom? (While homosexual sodomy, adultery, and fornication are now legal, other forms of sexual activity remain illegal.)
* By what standard are the laws of a country properly based?

[Sunsong]

Right, I have not written posts to you. *You* wrote a post to me - and the only thing I personally want to discuss of the things you have posted is whether or not you, like EV, think that people have no *right* to do wrong. I see that view as similar to how Islamists think - (which if you have been reading my posts - you already know). Though you did not answer clearly - I think you are saying that *no* you don't agree with EV and that you do think people have the *right* to do wrong.

The other issue that I find of interest in your writing is I want to know whether you are advocating for a law against sodmomy.

Just as I don't agree that slavery was a good law - or the denial of voting rights to women - I see laws against sodmony as repressive.

As I have said in several posts - I advocate for the most freedom possible. That would include freedom to engage in acts that some disapprove of - as adultery, fornication, sodomy, divorce etc. I do not want to see such things a rape of children legal - or rape itself legal. I think consenting adults - that catch phrase - should be a guide in sexual activites.