People have the *right* to do what you consider to be wrong. You do NOT have the *right* to deny them their individual rights. When you attempt to cross that line - you stand closer to the Islamists - than to America.
I don't see how you can claim to love this country and at the same time - try to deny people you disagree with their full human rights.
The underlying philosophy of the Founding Fathers was that of natural rights, to paraphrase the Declaration of Independence, that humans are endowed with inalienable rights: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This language was borrowed from John Locke, in his
Two Treatises on Government, where he referred to the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property. These rights are also called primary rights, and other rights, for example, freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, protection against arbitrary government acts, derive from these primary rights. These primary rights were called natural rights by the philosophers of the natural law tradition who affirmed their existence because they believed they were derived from human nature (which Christians believe is the specific creation of God), not created by government legislation. The natural law tradition was developed to a great extent by the Catholic theologian Thomas Aquinas, who saw the natural law as independent from civil law. He defined natural law as "nothing else than the rational creature's participation in the eternal law." Hugo Grotius, John Locke, and William Blackstone, though non-Catholic, strongly influenced the Founding Fathers, as well as the Protestant nations of Northern Europe, Prussia/Germany excepted.
Yet no one in the natural law tradition believed that these laws abrogated divine revelation. Remember that while the Founders were believers in natural law, they did not believe that the law should contradict divine revelation, a position held by Aquinas and the Protestant legal theorists of the 17th and 18th Centuries. With relation to sodomy, the act was illegal in all states until 1962. Even Jefferson, who was among the least Christian of the Founders, supported the criminalization of sodomy in the post-independence laws of Virginia. Divorce was difficult to obtain before the early 20th Century, abortion was illegal, and pornography was generally outlawed.
To say that supporting laws limiting sexual license is the equivalent of Sharia law is equating the natural law philosophers of the West, such as Aquinas, Grotius, and Locke, with Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab, the totalitarian founder of the Wahhabi sect of Islam. By that standard, America prior to 1960 was under a Christian equivalent of sharia law. The fifty states were theocracies like Iran since the fall of the Shah or Saudi Arabia under the Wahhabists.