Hey, didn't your boy Francis call us all "queers?"
hmmmm?
So, you want government to pass laws on who can and can't get pregnant? Why stop with lesbians, why not restrict the poor out of having kids, since, statistically, they have more of a chance of being raised in a bad environment. Or, anyone with any family history of an illness that may shorten their life. You wouldn't want to have mommy or daddy die of a heart attack when junior is only a few years old. And, how about a maximum age for pregnancy!
Theocracies don't work, I suggest you move to one, you might be happy living under that kind of system.
I'm guessing you are really into your home owner association.
I'm sure it would have been far preferable if she was an unwed welfare mother or a crack whore who passes her kids off to her tricks.
ROTFLMAO. The mental picture that paints fits so perfectly! Someone with a clipboard taking notes on whose Christmas lights are left up one day beyond association regulation.
I get this vision of Richard Pryor's anal white man routine
LOL!
As far as building codes go, I'm as libertarian as the day is long. I'd rather live in the woods in a funky cabin than in anywhere near a homeowners' association...
Poor? I was dirt poor and raised two children as a single parent, the other half ditched early on. Lack of money has nothing to do with morality or children being raised well. I don't know why some of you focus on money so much, as though more money makes people good or happy.
All laws are legislating morality. You and your ilk just don't want any laws that restrict any kind of sexual behavior; or rather, you seem to want laws that promote sexual immorality. I bet you don't even admit there is such a thing as sexual immorality. It's as though sex is sancrosanct. It's just like fire - fire can keep you warm, cook your food, or burn down a city. Needs limits; just like sex.
BTW, you guys keep getting the meaning of "theocracy" wrong, I don't know how many times I've posted the dictionary meaning. Not going to look it up again. But basically it means rule BY priests, imams, religious hierarchy. It does not mean having laws based on basic religious principles, which is what all laws are based on.
(Which you would know, if you've ever read about the history of English law. Ever heard of Blackwell?)