this issue is not about gay marriage, and its not about gay adoption either. those are public policy issues.
this story is simply about a woman who wants to have a baby. HER OWN BABY. you disagree with her sexuality - fine - what exactly do you want to do about the fact that she wants to have a baby? abort it? have the government seize the baby and force it into a foster home - you know, a good home with two loving religious parents, like Andrea Yates had.
It seems to me that those who shout about *moral absolutes* are generally those who *absolutely* want to dictate to others what their *morals* should be.
SS and some others gravitate to homosexual agenda threads so they can push their promotion of homosexuality, call people like us "Taliban" and Nazis, prudes and homophobes.
Love is all there is - de de dedede, Love is all there is... etc. Love makes a family, Hate is not a family value....
I've seen all those bumper stickers in Eugene.
The fact is that the homosexual agenda is leftist, pursues domination, rejects traditional morality in every sense of the word, and is part of the platform of leftists since there were leftists. A chaotic citizenry (which will happen - is happening - the more the natural family is destroyed) - is an easy group of people to dominate. A citizenry in chaos will welcome a benevolent dictator who will fix everything.
Funny that those who support the homosexual agenda here on FR don't see this...or maybe they do?