Posted on 12/07/2006 7:16:54 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
"You forgot to add that her Daddy's the Veep, so she's entilted!"
"Entilted"? I always thought her posture was pretty good.
I like driving trolls back to the cave where they belong.
Hey, I didn't send my kids to public schools, I knew better.
Your time would be better spent trying to push abstinence and the avoidance of high risk behavior in the public schools.
It wasn't the spelling, it was the so-called relativity.* Moral relativists such are yourself are not values neutral at all. Your moral relativity is actually inverse morality, and quite fascistic, since you pretend that no one should judge, sexual behaviors such as sex outside of marriage and homosexuality are morally benign, yet you spend a lot of time slamming those who disagree with you.
So you are not neutral, if you were really as non-judgemental as you pretend to be, then our POV would be just as valid as yours. Moral relativity is found on internal inconsistency and hypocricy. It's just a different standard. But moral absolutists such as myself are happy to debate facts and issues, while moral "relativists" such as you never debate facts, you merely name call, create ridiculous straw man, spout leftist/libertarian slogans and belittle the character of those who disagree.
You're actually pretty funny - a classic.
*But you knew this - just another of your little tricks. Layer upon layer of duplicity is your style, you really think you're quite clever. We're not all bumpkins with straw in our hair - although actually I do live in the country and quite often do have straw in my hair... ;-)
In a public forum for political activism? Yes. The implication is clear.
You suffer from delusions. Many, many things are discussed on this website by reasonable adults. To simply lump them all as proposals for "political activism" is naive.
Should not such women take a look at themselves and figure out why they are not attracting men?
I mean isn't this just the inverse of the whiny "nice guy" who sits home alone because he won't do whatever it takes to change into something more desirable to women?
Let's see, how is it supposed to be spelled,,,, E N T I T L E D.Yeah, that's it!
First of all, he said "career" not just "working." And secondly, it's not all about you.
Really.
People are more well-adjusted when raised by two married committed parents. People whose careers are more important than their families generally have children who show that decision.
As people who choose single parenthood likewise do so to the detriment to their children.
I'm glad things worked out for you, but brodly speaking in aggregate terms, the ideal situation is still ideal.
And Dave, clearly all the threads about Lindsey Lohan, Britney Spears, and Paris Hilton are also about political activism. I mean the implication is clear. LOL.
How "Big" L libertarian of you.
I specifically said "materially and emotionally", and you decided to stop at money. Interesting.
I keep a copy of the Constitution in my glove box........want to test those waters?
....tread carefully.
Hate the sin, love the sinner.
Whatever.
Bet you that 2/3rds of the folks on this thread think that it aught to be illegal for lesbians to have kids, and would advocate the Government taking them away once they are born because they are going to be 'psychologically troubled' or some other bu!!s#!t rationalization.
I know the type. They are really screwing up the Republican Party and the Conservative movement on a whole.
And if it isn't calling for Government action, then we have no reason to be discussing her private life anyway beyond just simple gossip, which is unnecessary and rude.
I stand by my original statement. We should leave Mary Cheney alone.
Fine. Are money and "emotions" adequate substitutes for a father? Can women deliver emotionally the same thing men can? Can a woman be a father?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.