Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio
Besides- all this 'science' ignores the very core problem with evolution- the information in the DNA thast I mentioned before- in order for evolution to even be a viable question. one would have to explain where the information for the DNA came from- was it eternal? It must have been because the info could not come from nothing as evolution insists that it did. The info- which is far to advanced for mere evolving from nothing to account for, had to have a mind behind it's creation- look- we can argue symantics all day long, but at the end of the day, the problem of Gene information still plagues the evolution hypothesis. Then, you STILL have the problems of overcoming the obstacles of jumping amino acids to protiens which is impossible but an absolutely necessary process for evolution to be viable.- Then, after overcomming that impossible leap- you STILL have the problem of gene transfereance in order for species to evolve into other species- THEN- you have to explain the Cambrian explosion where entire and vast and complete species showed up on the scene all at once- Then you have to overcome the mutation conundrum where it would mathematically require a universe full of DNA and constant lightening strikes 24/7 for billions of years to create even one mutation that would be considered 'useful' enough to advance a species. The Time required is yet another impossible scenario for evolution to be viable. Talorigin can insult I.D all they like- they can cite this article and that one- but in the end- they take a HUGE leap of faith- and MUST rely on impossible hypothesis in order to beleive in their models of life.

Christian news and commentary at: sacredscoop.com ...

30 posted on 10/30/2006 10:07:19 AM PST by CottShop (http://sacredscoop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio

One more thing Dimensio- you said: [Nothing in science is "proven". Rather, reasonable conclusions are drown from evidence.]
No sir- it is NOT reasonable to conclude that species took impossible leaps in their evolutionary process- yet that is Exactly what Must be done if you beleive in evolution- There were secular scientific meetings in Chicago a few years ago in which the majority of scientists came to the conclusion that the present direction of evolution simply wasn't a feasible direction to take & it was overwhelmingly decided that a new direction had to be found if they were to keep the 'dream of eovlution' alive- Darwin himself, a self proclaimed denier of God, admitted that his model was a sham due to the lack of evidence which he correctly noted should be so evident that one could not deny evolution- Yet that is far from what we have- we have only titilating similarities between certain species that requires again huge leaps in faith. Evolutionsits will point to two similiar species & say- there you go- look- this one has stumps on the side of it's body & this one has more advanced 'legs' proving that they are related and evolving- what they DON'T tell you is the fact that biologically, the two species are so far apart that they can NOT be realted- not even close- They point to chimps and humans and tell you that because there is only a 6% difference (The actual biological figure is more like 20% difference, but they won't tell you this) thatwe must be related- Again- what they fail to inform you of is the fact that the remaining 6% (never mind that it is closer to 20% difference) is so incredibly huge in regards to the vast amount of gene differences, that there is no way we could be realted- we're not talking about simply a few genes here, and a few genes there- nope- we're talking about billions of gene information differences- anatomically, we're also seperated by a huge gulf that evolution simply could not overcome- Shows like the Natiuonal geographic love to present hteir fantasies and imply that the differences don't matter- but biologically and anatomically- these shows are right full of deceit. it aint as simple as they make it appear. Yet they won't for one minute admit that- So no Dimensio- Science is NOT about 'coming to reasonable conclusions' far from it- it is more like 'ingoring the impossibilities, and insisting that their view is right' (not to mention- attackign anyone that dissagrees with them and calling them ignorant)
Here is the link to the scientific meetings: http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/20hist12.htm


31 posted on 10/30/2006 10:24:40 AM PST by CottShop (http://sacredscoop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson