Main Entry:
sci·ence Pronunciation:
'sI-&n(t)s Function:
noun Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin
scientia, from
scient-, sciens having knowledge, from present participle of
scire to know; perhaps akin to Sanskrit
chyati he cuts off, Latin
scindere to split
1 : the state of knowing : knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding
2 a : a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study <the science of theology> b : something (as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge <have it down to a science>
3 a : knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method b : such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena : Seems to me by this definition I do know what science is. There is no I mean no testable method of evolution only fantasy.
You never have anything to say but circular reasoning. You never prove anything only claim that I am wrong without evidence. You claim I do not understand yet every time I prove you wrong. You bash me to make your self feel better. But you have not that is right not given me evidence that dead fossil bones gave birth to anything.
You would make a great politician, using many words and not saying a thing.
There is no I mean no testable method of evolution only fantasy.
Your ignorance of the existence of research supporting the theory of evolution does not negate the existence of research supporting the theory of evolution.
You never have anything to say but circular reasoning.
Please reference a specific argument that I have made wherein I assume the conclusion that I am attempting to demonstrate.
You never prove anything only claim that I am wrong without evidence.
You have claimed that nothing can be known from "dead bones". You are
wrong.
. You claim I do not understand yet every time I prove you wrong.
You have proven nothing. Thus far you have asserted that evolution is false, but you have provided no explanation to demonstrate that you understand what the theory of evolution is, nor have you show that you have any understanding of the evidence used to support the theory of evolution. You have made references to "dead bones" and responded to questions with complete non-sequiturs. Your statements have "proven" nothing thus far.
You bash me to make your self feel better
I am not "bashing" you. Stating that your claims are incorrect is not an attempt to insult you.
But you have not that is right not given me evidence that dead fossil bones gave birth to anything.
You are again misrepresenting evidence. "Dead fossil bones" do not reproduce, and no one has claimed that they do. That you make such a demonstratably false claim further reinforces my belief that you have not actually studied any information relevant to this topic.