.... I really do love science ...........
To: SubGeniusX
I've got to see that! I hope they televise it.
2 posted on
10/19/2006 7:12:30 PM PDT by
gotribe
(It's not a religion.)
To: SubGeniusX
Rewrite Story of Animal Evolution That is journalist-speak for "added a few new details."
Sorry if any creationists got all excited, but science adds new details all the time. Its what scientists do.
3 posted on
10/19/2006 7:29:00 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: SubGeniusX
"Ancient Fish Fossil May Rewrite Story of Animal Evolution" And they will continue to eat crow as they constantly rewrite the story of evolution, until they finally have to admit that there was no evolution, that God created the universe and it is not some 'accident'.
To: PatrickHenry
Found this while fiddling around:
Life Kingdoms
Nice overview of the Tree of Life.
To: SubGeniusX
If the oldest dinosaurs to date are approx. 230M years old (Hererrasaurus and Eoraptor) then this fish, if being claimed as the transitional fossil, at 380M years only leaves only 150M years to go from walking fish to dino? Seems rather short, no?
12 posted on
10/20/2006 6:19:44 PM PDT by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(If a pug barks and no one is around to hear it... they hold a grudge for a long time!)
To: SubGeniusX
The Bones are dead.
That only proves that a creature lived and died.
No proof that it was different then its parents or it's offspring were different.
Only appears to be an extinct kind of fish.
13 posted on
10/24/2006 9:45:57 PM PDT by
Creationist
(If the earth is old show me your proof. Salvation from the judgment of your sins is free.)
To: SubGeniusX
That transition from water to land has long fascinated scientists, but the fossil record of how it occurred is still incomplete.
Understatement
18 posted on
10/25/2006 8:55:19 PM PDT by
banalblues
(Thank God A Real American Won!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson