AK, I'm proud of you. That was a lucid, intelligent and well thought out argument. It certainly beats your indoor barbecue grill defense. You'll have to forgive me for the name calling, I mean after all, when somebody brings up Weber grills in an intellectual discussion, you as a rocket scientist would immediately dismiss them as a retard too.
I'm glad that you took a few moments out of your work at NASA to actually research the Enstrom study and Osteen ruling on the web. This makes for a much more interesting and intellectually stimulating debate.
Since I'm not worthy to debate a NASA rocket scientist, Mensa member with a 200 IQ about Dr. Enstrom's epidemiological study, I'll let you debate him since he doesn't need CSM or me to argue on his behalf:
Here's his website:
http://www.scientificintegrityinstitute.com/defense.html
In the meantime please enlighten us stupid people about the WHO report that suggested that ETS wasn't harmful, which was covered up and swept under the rug.
Do a little Google search on that one too. In a matter of fact I'll make it easy for you. I'll give you the link from Rush Limbaughs' site in a moment.
When you're done with that. Tell us how this stupidity about SHS passes the scientific test that the rest of us who don't live in a laboratory use; THE LAUGH TEST.
We've all been exposed to smoky environments for our entire lives. Name me one person who you can conclusively prove who has dropped dead from getting a whiff of a cigarette.
I don't work for NASA, you idiot.
In the meantime please enlighten us stupid people about the WHO report that suggested that ETS wasn't harmful, which was covered up and swept under the rug.
It didn't. It reached exactly the opposite conclusion. Don't believe me? Read the actual summary monograph yourself.. Tobacco addicts don't just kill themselves, they kill those around them.