Your semantics asside, the same argument is used by the loony left to limit religeous behaviours such as prayer in public schools. You know, the unwilling victims of such dastardly behaviours and such.
Feel free to continue to use the sword that will be used against you multiple times. Just don't be surprised when your ox is gored.
I'm acutely aware of the GLEEFUL goring of my ox hereon.
I may be a lot of things. But I'm not blind.
I observe a lot of wailing on such threads against folks against smoking labeling smoking BEHAVIORS in less than lauditory ways.
The screams are usually of the flavor of individual rights; freedom of behavior and expression etc.
AND
the wailing usually takes the hypocritical form that the smokers ought to be protected from the anti-smokers labeling smoking behaviors in anything remotely like negative terms. And when the anti-smokers don't comply with the demands of the smokers TO CONFORM TO THEIR REALITY, the smoking WORD POLICE come harshly down on them with a vengeance that would make Shrillery blush . . . or close to it--I don't think it's possible for The Shameless one to blush, really.
Impressive, those SEMANTICS POLICE.