Replies

I say ; "anyone born after 1960 should not be eligible for any medical subsistance related to nicotine if they CHOOSE to kill themselves after all the publicity smoking has gotten over the years."

Yep, another FReeper that has just accepted socialism and proposes fascist solutions to the problems caused by it. This great Republic is dead.

I say ; "anyone born after 1960 should not be eligible for any medical subsistance related to nicotine if they CHOOSE to kill themselves after all the publicity smoking has gotten over the years."

Yet I will bet you are the first one in line for an AIDS walk, or to promote "research" into AIDS with contributions. An almost completely voluntary, but totally preventable disease. The only Innocent parties are babies born with it, health care people stabbed by accident, or women who's husbands had a choice and chose wrong. (All of the involuntary cases could have been prevented except for the selfishness of others)

The numbers of people who are selfish and endanger others is centralized in the gay community, NOT in smokers. There isn't one spec of valid evidence that even second had smoke is dangerous. Some people are just willing sheep being led to slaughter.

Whether one actually is a smoker or not, to not see the hypocrisy and the drastic contrast between these two habits, as well as the attacks using misinformation, is just that. Blindly following the other sheep right to the slaughter house, and then stepping up for your own slaughter without question.