Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: patton
Why not? if 25% of the pop can pay $5/pk for their sins, why not 100% of the pop for equal harm? Sounds pretty flat to me.

Then you don't understand the flat tax....

246 posted on 10/17/2006 9:22:15 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]


To: paulat
Why not? if 25% of the pop can pay $5/pk for their sins, why not 100% of the pop for equal harm? Sounds pretty flat to me.

I guess...to reiterate...that's a consumption tax...not a flat tax.

250 posted on 10/17/2006 9:24:24 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

To: paulat; patton
Wait a minute.

Paula, you just made me go through an elementary explanation of wage/price demand, and the theory of taxation, and now you're lecturing on the merits of the fair tax?

Just kill me now.

253 posted on 10/17/2006 9:30:06 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson