In #267 the operative word is should, a conditional word as used in the sentence. That certainly does not say that I believe the entitlement proportions Will increase,
I'll not bother to explain it further to you (though I could) since you don't wish to understand.
"... so you admitted before that these rates will probably go up ..."
Nope - no such thing nor is that what #267 says. You're merely too ignorant to understand it apparently and far too eager to try to call others a liar - when they aren't. As I told you we can go on with this forever as far as I'm concernet. I'll not admit to lying about something when I haven't and the sooner you realize that the better off your frustration level will be ... but suit yourself.
"Your 100th lame attempt to change the subject. In my opinion the rates will go up, but that is not the issue. I did not say they 'must' go up as you continue to spin a new lie about. "
Your #464 certainly says otherwise by the parenthetical expression you tried to leave out to show the opposite. Despite your attempt at deceit, you have ceertainly said by that post that "upward only" is the only way - just like Looey.
Looey - please answer #518.
PIGDOG post 273: "I've said nothing about any Congressional action in raising the rate since that will clearly not be required."
When in previous posts you most certainly did:
post 310 by pigdog: "The infamous "unelected bureaucrats raising taxes" ploy you've continually tried (unsuccessfully) to use isn't correct and never has been. They merely determine the split of tax revenue required to fund the S/S entitlement as required by S/S law - which it should be noted isn't part of the FairTax law at all. They have no power to raise (or lower) the FairTax rate ... that's what we pay the "big bux" to Congress for."
post 328 by pigdog: "Any change in the overall FairTax rate would have to be done by Congress, not some "unelected bureaucrat".
post 351 by pigdog: " And to change the FairTax rate it would, indeed, take congressional action."
post 368 bt pigdog: "This means that the remaining portion which is the General Revenue Rate will in effect increase since the other two have decreased and the statutory rate for all three combined must be 23% (or whatever the rate ends up as in the bill) unless changed by Congress."
It is one thing to make a mistake, but to continue to lie about making a mistake is absurd. So you were wrong on posts 310, 328, 351 and 368. And then you were wrong in your denial. But why can't you admit it. You keep changing the subject and making things up. You have basically have come around and agree with lewislynn's point anyways, you now seem to just be disagreeing about how the rate will change. Admit it and move on.