[pigdog]

Oh BTW, you neglected to post your complete message from the part of #464 you offered (that I missed). At the end of the statement you also said "... (which it would not, BTW) ..." meaning that you reject the possibility of my observation about entitlement rates lowering and thereby you are saying that the upward-only change is the only possibility - and to me his greatly changes the import of what you say back to the original disagreement.

And that's exactly what you and Looey have been contending all along - that the FairTax rate will only increase automatically. Would you like to deny that (again)??

[Always Right]

..." meaning that you reject the possibility of my observation about entitlement rates lowering and thereby you are saying that the upward-only change is the only possibility

Your 100th lame attempt to change the subject. In my opinion the rates will go up, but that is not the issue. I did not say they 'must' go up as you continue to spin a new lie about. I was very clear on numerous posts that was not the issue. But on a funnier note, let's see what you said in post 267

Pigdog post 267: The import of my quote is that should the costs of these two entitlements continue apace with their present growth, the FairTax rate will eventually be revised upward to accommodate the costs....

LOL, so you admitted before that these rates will probably go up. But let's not get sidetracked. You continue to spin and lie about what the bill says and then deny what have said about what the bill says and then lie about what others have said. It is just one lie after another with you.