[Always Right]

Your and Looey's continual stating that the rate can only go upward

I have not said it can only go upward. Why must you continue to lie and act like everyone else is. This is too damn funny. And you just keep adding more lies everytime you post.

[pigdog]

The contention of both of you has always been that the relevant language in the bill allows only an increase in the 23% rate by adjusting the two entitlement proportions only upward, thereby raising the 23% rate since the GRR is set at 14.91. You both continually blabbers about such a "rate increase" and attack me for "lying" to suggest any other possibility.

In my posts to you I have not addressed such a rate increase (the entitlement proportions) at all and do not consider it even a possibility due to the increased economic expansion caused by the bill. Instead of continually yapping about "liar" and trying to bolster your own egos by throwing personal attacks, why don't you show me by actual numerical examples how your desired scenario would occur with an increase in economic activity. Show what would need to happen to the two proportions in relation to the overall rate.

Also numerically show the circumstances required for the rise in the two proportions to create your "unelected bureaucrat scenario.