"... you continue to insist your misreading of the bill is correct ... "
In fact, I'm insisting that the bill means exactly what it says and that the three of you are exactly 180 degrees out of phase with the direction of economic activity under the FairTax (which you always have been due to your blinding bias against it) and that causes all three to be completely incorrect on the rate mixture and how it operates - as discussed in posts #334, 351, amd 368.
What are you even talking about? I have not even argued anything the direction of the economic activity. It has nothing to do with what the bill says. It is just a lame attempt by you to shif the discussion away from what the bill says in 3rd grade English.