I'm sorry to see that you don't understand what the term "in practice" means. Perhaps someone can help you out.
I'm sorry to see that you don't understand what the term "in practice" means.Well when you've finished with your usual attempts at ridicule you can define what it means in context of the quote you posted...Or maybe that would be too revealing.
Maybe "in practice" means things that "could" be done in your dream world like spending freezes and spending cuts to accommodate your 23% rate rather than practical applications.
It's more than just a little telling that you have to call for hypothetical dream world applications to accomodate your 23% revenue neutral rate since this is the first time I recall you or any other Fairtaxer, including AFFT, ever calling for spending freezes or cuts (Oh wait, don't tell me. Spending cuts have been called for by many Fairtax supporters on many of these threads..or words to that effect). Now you only want cuts and freezes to protect your lies about an arbitrary rate.