Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: lewislynn
Simple logic would suggest a higher, not lower rate for "revenue neutrality"....Maybe that's why pigdog didn't reply to your query.

Guess you're one of those that thinks taxation is a zero sum game, and that static ananysis reflects reality.

146 posted on 10/13/2006 10:40:17 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created..." - Thomas Jefferson et al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
Guess you're one of those that thinks taxation is a zero sum game, and that static ananysis reflects reality.
No I just don't pretend that "revenue neutral" sales tax doesn't have meaning when revenue's have increased by income tax tax cuts.

If you think you can show how adding 30% to existing retail sales and services would not have an negative effect and raise the same amount of revenue as the Bush tax cuts...have at it.

167 posted on 10/13/2006 2:00:23 PM PDT by lewislynn (Fairtax = lies, hope, wishful thinking, conjecture and lack of logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson