Evos trot out a lie as truth and when truth is presented it is denied as being false because their scientists (who back up the lie) won't disprove their findings. Actually, their assumptions.
Truth, what truth?
Biblical truth, or scientific truth?
Because there is a huge difference between the 2.
Biblical truth is based on faith, you don't need evidence to believe it.
Whereas Scientific "truth" is a bit harder to come by, or to make real, so to speak. Science takes real evidence, things that you can literally put your hands on, no faith necassary, and as that evidence comes together, it leads to a conclusion by science of what it means and how it got there.
This is reality, this is how science works.
When you have some solid evidence, something that you can literally put your hands on, like a fossil that is half cat and half dog, or a dog giving birth to a fish, Human bones fossilized and mixed in with the same strata as dinosaur fossils, or whatever other thing that would be impossible if evolution is true, then you have falsified the theory.
Find evidence that shows evolution is false, hard, scientific evidence, that will pass peer review.
I have yet to see it, but, as far as your truths as lies bit, sorry, you couldn't be more wrong, and your propaganda does not say much about your honesty.
Evolution is one of the best backed scientific theories there is, all you have to do is find the evidence to falsify it.
If you do, you could indeed win the nobel prize.