And perhaps they are logical and substantiated which puts the evos in a corner. You would like creos to argue utilizing evo websites. That's like asking Republicans to debate the war on terror using Democrat talking points. You can set the trap but you will not find many creos falling into it. We are kind of a smart bunch. You see, we are not puppets being manipulated by the evo so-called scientists. By the way, I see Di is responding to you in regards to my responses to him. Fear must be setting in.
If you define "evo websites" as mainstream science, yes. I would.
The creationist websites are not exactly paragons of mainstream science. They tend to lie, distort the facts, and omit huge amounts of data which don't agree with their preconceived notions.
And creationists want this stuff taught in science classes? What a joke!
I mean, just look at the scientific evidence for a global flood. There isn't any! But that doesn't stop the creationist websites. I have been studying them for some time, but I can't seem to understand what they are saying. Each is different, half of them contradict the other half, and none match mainstream science. What a joke!
If you don't believe me, let me know. I have some evidence from my own research that discredits the global flood in the western US. I would be happy to post it for you.