WRONG AGAIN! DING, DING, DING! WRONG AGAIN!
Linda Moulton Howe is probably the best expert.
As extensive research has demonstrated, the hoaxers produce quite a minority of the crop circles.
But I've cited the VERY SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIED FACTS BEFORE--FACTS PUBLISHED IN PEER REVIEWD JOURNALS.
Supposedly the priests of scientism respect peer reviewed journals in truly scientific journals
EXCEPT WHEN THE ARTICLES CONTRADICT THEIR DOCTRINES OF FAITH IN 'CHAOTIC CHANCE PLUS TIME = ORDER' NONSENSE.
So, it's clear that their assertions and contentions are bankrupt. They no more respect peer reviewed journals than they respect Shrillery's farts. They only respect their own specific doctrinal arrogance, smugness and pontifications.
No real surprise there.
Such ignorance about crop circles coupled with such strident hostile, derisive pontifications. Evidently in the realms of the religion of scientism, pontifical bombast correlates highly in a positive direction with the level of ignorance about the topic.
You don't believe them, but insist on some extraterrestrial or other extraordinary cause.
You better bring some real evidence to the table.
And some explanation why these suddenly appeared, and have increased in complexity, and are only found in certain areas.
They grow wheat in Kansas, and the Palouse, and a lot of other countries. Where are all the circles in those areas?
I think you better start producing some data.
Want's your opinion of the face on Mars?