[Dimensio]

But that choice wasn't in the poll, so I guess if we are GOING to teach history, might was well teach competing history as well. Evolutionists can't PROVE that God didn't make everything look just like they see it as part of his creation, so there na na na.

Should we also teach the competing hypothesis that the universe was created Last Thursday by the Queen of Mars, the cat Queen Maeve?

[CharlesWayneCT]

No, we should teach science in science classes, and history in history classes.

And for high school, with only so many hours in the day and days in the year, you could stick with recorded history. It's not like the kids spend half their time sitting around looking for MORE things to learn.

I'm being too rigid because of time constraints. I don't mind brief discussions of the common scientific accepted history of the world stuff, big bang amoeba etc. etc., but don't cram it down kid's throats, don't require them to believe it to pass the course, and don't get preachy about it or ridicule them for their religious beliefs.

We'd all get along much better if the schools weren't trying to indoctrinate students into the world of secularism.