Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: mjaneangels@aolcom
"It was about the rights of her spouse versus the parents,"

Yes, you are correct. It is about her husband's rights. It never really was about her rights.

So now we have you on record indicating that a spouse's rights are more important than the individual's rights, even when the individual is dehydrated to death, the spouse is whose right ought to be preserved.

WRONG.

You aren't really that dense, are you? Terri Schiavo was totally incapacitated and unable to make decisions or express her wishes. In such circumstances, the law recognizes the spouse as having final say. That's just the way it is.

RIGHT.

509 posted on 09/07/2006 4:33:51 PM PDT by TampaDude (If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the PROBLEM!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies ]


To: TampaDude

"You aren't really that dense, are you? "

This is not about me being dense. I used your words, not mine.


510 posted on 09/07/2006 5:26:12 PM PDT by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies ]

To: TampaDude

You don't know the laws of the state of Florida. If a husband is a bad guardian, they can be removed as guardian. He was a really bad guardian but since the Judge, Crist's hero Judge Greer has big money backing his evil deed, he wrote the first death order for a disabled person in American History. Terri was the very first.


513 posted on 09/07/2006 5:43:04 PM PDT by floriduh voter (www.conservative-spirit.org or Join Terri's Legacy List Contact: 8mmmauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson