Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
Yep, it's better just to declare your opponents potheads. It sure beats having a comprehensive and defensible position of your own.

Look, if you want a comprehensive and defensible position out of me, go look through my post history. I have already been 'round and 'round with the hemp constituency here on FR. It's like asking water not to be wet.

So whatever. They want their weed and they want the g'mnt to not arrest them for it. They drone on and on about "rights" but don't say boo about ACTUAL lost liberties such as eminent domain and leftist speech codes. It's all about the pot.

APf

168 posted on 09/04/2006 5:14:27 AM PDT by APFel (Individualism. The alpha and the omega.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: APFel
So whatever. They want their weed and they want the g'mnt to not arrest them for it. They drone on and on about "rights" but don't say boo about ACTUAL lost liberties such as eminent domain and leftist speech codes.

Like heck. A lot of the groups opposed to federal pot laws and in favor of decriminalization also work long and hard for other Constitutional rights. You, however, are the typical cafeteria conservative, who believes in limited government as long as it doesn't limit what you want government to do.

172 posted on 09/04/2006 7:07:34 AM PDT by dirtboy (This tagline has been photoshopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson