"... their paid for whores, I mean 'economists', are very shady with their studies ..."
But not nearly so shady as the Treasury/Brookings Institute combine that propagandizes under color of governmental authority. That's next to criminal if not more so.
And the Jorgenson and other studies clearly set out their assumptions plus their rationale and backup days. The Tax Panel Report do not do so at all. They aren't even clear on what many of their assumptions are - or why. And they certainly throw numbers around like they were spending tax money.
LOL, so clear even to this day you deny what those assumptions were.
Its true, the tax panel report doesn't mention "backup days". Are those the days when the FairTax supporters back track on previous claims?