Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: lucysmom
It does address the FairTax, but does also figure the sales tax in several different ways.

pigdog does have a point, the commission's retail tax was completely different than the fairtax proposal. The commission's retail tax was honest. Assuming the government can tax itself to raise revenues is not honest.

616 posted on 09/07/2006 8:29:30 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right
Assuming the government can tax itself to raise revenues is not honest.

If that assumption were true, we could all get rich just by moving money from one pocket to another.

621 posted on 09/07/2006 8:52:44 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right
Well, obviously you're not always right, Rongie.

The Tax Panel evaluated some hypothetical retail sales tax that doesn't exist - that part is right.

Claiming that it shouldn't tax government, though, is quite incorrect since the income tax does so and all of the so-called flat tax plans do so as well. There is absolutely no rationale for NOT having the government tax itself since they do now. Not doing so would merely help the expansion of government - which is exactly the opposite of what anyone should want. The issue is not whether the taxing of government provides revenue or not, but whether it keeps the government from enlarging itself with a tax advantage compared to private businesses.

622 posted on 09/07/2006 8:54:04 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson