Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Save America with the ‘Fair Tax Act’
The Courier ^ | August 31,2006 | Gordon Bishop

Posted on 09/03/2006 5:18:40 AM PDT by Man50D

Abolish the federal income tax!

No more taxes on savings and investments!

A "Fair Tax" can completely fund the federal government, Social Security and Medicare!

You control how much you spend!

So what are we waiting for?

You, the taxpayers of America burdened with an income tax that is costly, wasteful and sinking America into inevitable bankruptcy. All current forms of federal taxation would end! You would keep 100 percent of your paycheck. You control how you spend your paycheck. It's your money. You make the decisions as to how you want to spend your money.

The Fair Tax would create more jobs and give the USA a level playing field when selling overseas. United States Senator John Linder (R-Georgia) is sponsoring the "Fair Tax Act of 2005." If enacted by Congress, it would accomplish all of the above. Simple. Easy. And affordable.

It's the best way to downsize government without disrupting the economy.

To join the "Fair Tax" movement in America, just sign the "Economic Freedom & Fairness" Petition supporting forward-thinking solutions. Go to www.grassfire.net and liberate the working class of taxpayers. Grassfire is trying to give the working class the same kind of freedom America's founders gave to those who joined the American Revolution in 1776 with the "Declaration of Independence." We won the Revolutionary War, but have lost our country since the 16th Amendment (income tax) became "Law" in 1913.

(Excerpt) Read more at bayshorenews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: dontdrinkthekoolaid; fraudtax; redherring; scam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,141-1,146 next last
To: balrog666
Yes, he seems to have accepted that. But he doesn't seem to know why.

LOL, true. It is nice to see more people standing up to the fairtax BS. The some merit going to a sales tax, but their sales pitch is complete fantasy.

661 posted on 09/07/2006 12:09:16 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom

No thanks, I think the FairTax just the way it's written is "just right", Goldilocks. I want to see government as much out of control of tax manipulation as possible.


662 posted on 09/07/2006 12:09:53 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
But that 9% is from a total of 22% embedded taxes.
You completely misunderstand pigdogese. The 22% figure is last month's lie, the 9% figure is this months and this month the 22% figure never existed...Get with the program.
663 posted on 09/07/2006 12:10:59 PM PDT by lewislynn (Fairtax = lies, hope, wishful thinking, conjecture and lack of logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
well, Rongie, most taxpayers will keep 100% of their current gross and prices will decline considerably. the only question is "how much" and I'm not sure at this point.

In any event even you naysayer ninnies have agreed that it till at least be a 9% drop. That's great progress since not too long ago you were basically all arguing that prices will go up with the removal of the income tax. Just keep on takin' those baby steps and you'll get there along with the FairTax when it passes.

664 posted on 09/07/2006 12:14:40 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom
Can you prove they don't??? Link, please - show us where it doesn't say that.

And besides, why do you like to claim FairTax supporters are backtracking? That's just the naysayers' spew. You're buying into more and more DemoLib nonsense. I suppose you soon be voting for Hillary.

665 posted on 09/07/2006 12:19:48 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom
Not the same thing, mommie. Go back and read it again. And the $0.87 was probably high anyway; seems likely it's less . That would have made i $4.60 or so and that's probably giving too much credit to the naysayers. The $4 figure seems about right, don't you think??? Figure it out mommie.
666 posted on 09/07/2006 12:23:36 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
In fact, the most likely rate is presently 19% rather than 23% ... still revenue neutral.
Fairtax economist Kotlikoff:
Tax Rates

Simulation analysis and a variety of empirical calculations suggest that the retail sales tax rate needed for revenue neutrality under the Fair Tax, assuming no decline in the real value of government purchases, would be roughly 30 percent when measured on a tax-inclusive basis. This tax rate could be expected to decline by 3 or so percentage points over time as the economy expands. Moreover, if the Fair Tax were structured to include the consumption of existing housing services in its tax base, the initial Fair Tax rate would probably be about 3 percentage points lower. This could be accomplished by assessing the tax on the imputed rent on housing, where the calculation of imputed rent is based on a fair market valuation of housing real estate. This valuation could be done by local municipalities in the course of appraising houses for local property taxes.

A tax-inclusive consumption tax rate of 30 percent translates into a tax-exclusive consumption tax rate of 43 percent. While the 43 percent rate sounds very high, proper comparison of the Fair Tax tax rate with the current payroll and income tax rates requires evaluating the consumption tax rate on a tax-inclusive basis. Even a 30 percent tax rate may sound like a high rate. But one needs to bear in mind that middle and upper income households in America are typically in combined income tax and payroll tax marginal tax brackets of 40 percent or more and that low income Americans are typically in even higher tax brackets once one considers the phase out of the earned income tax credit. Hence, given the state of U.S. marginal taxation, 30 percent is a low number.

Gee, I wonder who's the liar...The Fairtax economist or the faceless, self appointed spokesmouth using a phony name?
667 posted on 09/07/2006 12:24:42 PM PDT by lewislynn (Fairtax = lies, hope, wishful thinking, conjecture and lack of logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom
That's an easy one. As I told you earlier it's when it's a spreadsheet listing that I originated. If you'd have been smart enough to originate it, you could call it fried butter for all I care.

As it is, it's a spreadsheet listing ... got it???

668 posted on 09/07/2006 12:26:04 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
well, Rongie, most taxpayers will keep 100% of their current gross and prices will decline considerably. the only question is "how much" and I'm not sure at this point.

No, fairytaxers have maintained for many years that prices would fall 23%. It is only recently that that has changed as their hidden assumptions have been revealed.

In any event even you naysayer ninnies have agreed that it till at least be a 9% drop.

At most 9%.

That's great progress since not too long ago you were basically all arguing that prices will go up with the removal of the income tax.

No one ever argued that the removal of the income tax would cause prices to go up. Can you go one sentense without lying and making a fool of yourself?

Just keep on takin' those baby steps and you'll get there along with the FairTax when it passes.

Don't worry, I will not be holding my breath.

669 posted on 09/07/2006 12:27:44 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
"But with his employees pocketing more money and prices going up, will business owners be happy to just maintain their same profits? "

He knows that foreign manufacturers don't have that 9% to play with, so they're stuck. Knowing your competitor can't lower his prices, why would you? You're just leaving money on the table.

670 posted on 09/07/2006 12:30:37 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
"... You never can be fully honest, can you? ..."

Well, ONE of us can't - but it's not me. As I told you I see no more coming out of the 22% figure you quote although more may come out of other places to help reduce prices, I seriously doubt that it will come out of that you call the 22% (which I call 23%) from the income tax/payroll tax withholdings since I doubt that even those firms who do not have union (or other) employment agreements (try the government for example or a large school system) will be able to reduce employee's wages.

If for no other reason I think the competition for workers in the rapidly expanding economy the FairTax brings about will largely preclude that sort of robbing of employees.

671 posted on 09/07/2006 12:36:32 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Thanx, Rongie. Glad to see you got it right this time. Keep up the good work.
672 posted on 09/07/2006 12:38:06 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
"since not too long ago you were basically all arguing that prices will go up with the removal of the income tax."

The only argument I saw were that prices would rise with the addition of the Fair Tax. YOU argued they would stay the same with the Fair Tax -- that the Fair Tax merely made visible the existing embedded taxes. If the employer kept ALL withholding, they might.

But then you made the mistake of saying, in addition to that, everyone would receive 100% of their paychecks. We told you all along it was either/or. Now you're starting to come around.

673 posted on 09/07/2006 12:39:32 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Please show me where I've claimed that there would be 23% of embedded tax. And if you don't think the approx $4 figure is correct, let's see your calculation and reasoning.


674 posted on 09/07/2006 12:41:29 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
"will be able to reduce employee's wages."

Reduce? Assuming the employer kept all payroll tax and federal income tax withholding, the take-home pay would stay the same.

"As I told you I see no more coming out of the 22% figure"

Well, at least you admitted that the 22% (23%) exists and that today's drug dealer/tax-avoider/criminal is currently paying it.

675 posted on 09/07/2006 12:44:28 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Bassackwards, Rongie. Prices will go down when the income tax is removed, not up. They only increase when the FairTax is imposed and even then most people will pay a far lower effective tax rate than under the income tax ... and on lower-priced goods. That "$100 baseball bat" that you have to earn $114 to buy (or more in higher income tax brackets) will now fall to $91.00 plus the FairTax or $98.12 ... and that's all you have to earn to buy it.

And there'd certainly be no reason to maintain the same profits since with the greatly expanding economy of the FairTax you'd be more likely to expand the profits by doing more business. The purchasing power of the business owner will increase also, just as for the wage earner.

676 posted on 09/07/2006 12:56:36 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
"... That is something they had been in denial about for years ..."

Not sure as to who is meant by "they", but I've had no "denial". In fact, there are other places that price reductions might be found other than just employee wage/payroll withholding. You nattering naysayers don't seem to grasp that. But certainly 9% is a good start - or even 5% at which point the FairTax does just fine, too. Then, too so would 12-15% for that matter.

677 posted on 09/07/2006 1:03:48 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Since you've never studied it, how do you know??? Oh, yeah, Robbie told you that and HE'D never lie - right???


678 posted on 09/07/2006 1:05:14 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 661 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Hate to burst you balloon, Looey, but I've never HAD a "22% figure". Must be Looeyitis breaking out on you in a rash of ignorance.
679 posted on 09/07/2006 1:08:44 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
Bassackwards, Rongie. Prices will go down when the income tax is removed, not up.

???? What are you talking about. You just make crap up and post it? No one said prices would go up when the income tax is removed.

680 posted on 09/07/2006 1:22:28 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,141-1,146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson