Oh there's a blatant liar around here all right, but it isn't me. For the benefit of your highly selective memory let me recap. When one poster pointed out that Davis abused power far more than Lincoln did you replied with the following:
"That tends to happen when you are fighting a war for your very survival. The 'tyranny' of Lincoln had been previously unmatched by any previous President (the draft, his actions in Maryland, suspension of Habeas Corpus)."
No comment on Davis other than a feeble attempt to justify is actions and immediately criticizing Lincoln. So apparently in your world when Davis declares martial law, that's good. When Lincoln suspends habeas corpus, that's bad. When Davis enacts conscription, that's good. When Lincoln does it, that's tyranny. When Davis ignores his constitution and tramples on property rights, that's justified because he's "fighting a war for his very survival." When Lincoln does that...wait a minute...Lincoln didn't do that.