LOL! You don't deny it? You are the poster who almost always refers to the 'Davis regime'. I enjoy responding to your assertations in kind, as far more historians consider it to be the Lincoln regime, and that he was a dictator, even though some of the Lincoln cult consider him to be a benevolent dictator, if such could be said to exist.
Can you imagine someone claiming Attila the Hun, Hitler or Sadaam Hussein to be benovolent? ROTF!!! As far as insulting anyone, OBL did make the comment that there was no distinction between civilians and the military. You have made similar claims here, defending the tactics of the Lincoln regime, Sherman [*SPIT*], Sheridan etc.
Now pardon me if you take offense, but I would certainly be in position to know of the atrocities committed against my ancestors, and I find it disgusting that you would revel in their slow death by starvation thanks to Union depradations against innocent civilians. That position aligns your with those that revelled in the death of thousands on 11 Sep 2001. All I'm saying is that our Commander-in-Chief - President Bush - attempts to minimize collateral deaths - I wholly support that position. I also agree with him that OBL must be hunted down and killed, or 'brought to justice' as the President says. I certainly DON'T support the policies of any President or American, that finds cause to celebrate the deaths of the innocents among us.
I can't imagine reveling in the starvation of any innocent civilian. However, in this particular case I'm forced to consider the source, and it's past history of extreme bias, and I maintain a healthy skepticism as to the story's veracity. Pardon me if that offends you.