No, it takes knowledge of the evidence. That you are incapable of understanding a subject has no bearing on the subject's validity. A three-year-old doesn't understand calculus; it does not mean calculus is crap.
No, it takes knowledge of the evidence. That you are incapable of understanding a subject has no bearing on the subject's validity. A three-year-old doesn't understand calculus; it does not mean calculus is crap.
So, Let me get this straight. Your argument is that, since OJ might have killed his wife, and you made the decision that he did it, therefore, the ruling of the jury that heard the evidence, who were all three years old, just didn't understand what was shoved in to the glove.
Therefore, I am to believe that there is no God.
Get back to me, when you actually have something to say.