To: Junior
sirchtruth will be back with his inane question on the next such thread. No matter how many times he's given an answer he isintrinsically unable to actually assimilate any new data and appears to be stuck, educationally, somewhere in grade school.LOL! Yea, to some elitist, superior intellect I guess my questions are quite "inane," thanks for noticing!
Alex, I'll take wisdom for 500!
18 posted on
08/04/2006 4:45:04 AM PDT by
sirchtruth
(No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
To: sirchtruth
Yea, to some elitist, superior intellect I guess my questions are quite "inane," thanks for noticing!
Your question is 'inane' because you continue to ask it despite having repeatedly been given an explanation that your question is founded upon a faulty premise. This suggests that you are not asking your question as a means of gaining knowledge, but because you are attempting to foster doubt by deliberately and dishonestly misrepresenting the subject.
52 posted on
08/04/2006 6:52:47 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: sirchtruth
Dude.... there was NO explosion! Space-time expanded. Picture an uninflated balloon with a number of dots on it. Now picture that balloon being inflated. The dots move away from one another as the surface of the balloon expands no? Well, the surface of the balloon is space-time and the dots are galaxies. That is your "big bang".
99 posted on
08/04/2006 10:06:34 AM PDT by
mother
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson