That is wonderful.
Please tell us what those first forms were, the mechanism by which they were produced, how the physical constants and laws were calculated, the means by which they were implemented, and the nature of the entity doing all of these things.
we have no evidence that any kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, or species has evolved into an entirely different kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, or species.
That is unfortunately untrue. There is a very great deal of evidence of such evolution.
You appear to be a very angry individual. Perhaps you should seek out the source of your anger?
Heck, I have no idea. But evolution doesn't explain any of that either, nor does it even try, and that was my point: no dog in the hunt.
Iggy: "we have no evidence that any kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, or species has evolved into an entirely different kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, or species."
That is unfortunately untrue. There is a very great deal of evidence of such evolution.
Maco-evolution evidence? Great! Show me the plant-to-animal (or vice-versa) transitional fossils! Bring me the bones of the walking, breathing, eating, dandelions! I want to trade my religion for yours!
You appear to be a very angry individual. Perhaps you should seek out the source of your anger?
You misread the tone of my original post. Not angry. Serious questions in a playful tone is what I intended.
I don't get angry over evolution/creation debates. I am disturbed by the insults hurled by creationists and EVO's, though creationists are by far more, um, serene. See post 909 for anger.
As for the debate itself, I just laugh at it most of the time, and tend to poke fun at it. After all, if the athiest-type EVO's are right and the Christian ID'ers wrong, then so what? Nothing changes, I've lost nothing, and no lives have been wasted. Pretty scary and sad if the opposite is true, ne cest pa?