If I were to give you an example for which there is no current scientific explanation yet the event actually did occur and is on record, would you stamp that event as irrational or the investigation of the event as irrational?
"If I were to give you an example for which there is no current scientific explanation yet the event actually did occur and is on record, would you stamp that event as irrational or the investigation of the event as irrational?"
Would depend on the details. Saying it is *on record* is extremely vague.