To: King Prout
Actually the goal of creation "science" is to undermine real science. It is actually apologetics.
ID is even worse, as it does the same thing while pretending (unsuccessfully) to be a science.
1,556 posted on
08/03/2006 8:48:30 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Coyoteman
yes, true.
I believe it was appropriate to first address why it is not science, before addressing why it is being pimped.
1,557 posted on
08/03/2006 9:06:39 AM PDT by
King Prout
(many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
To: Coyoteman
Actually the goal of creation "science" is to undermine real science.And thus creation science isn't any different from postmoderndeconstructionism. It's just a different name.
1,560 posted on
08/03/2006 5:58:49 PM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Coyoteman; King Prout
ID is even worse, as it does the same thing while pretending (unsuccessfully) to be a science. Someone descirbed ID as "creationism dressed up in white lab vestments".
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson