they were as follows:
**************************
fabian, a few questions:
1. why do you believe that the fossil record "should" be as complete and comprehensive as you describe?
Please be specific in your answer, including a description of the mechanism of preservation and a rationale for its necessary prevalence in your notional model of history.
2. what makes you believe that a representative organism from a transitional species would be in any way an "incomplete" life form?
Please be specific, including the anatomic anomalies your model predicts as necessary for an "incomplete" life form, and how "incomplete" life forms can be decisively discerned from "complete" life forms.
3. what leads you to assume that (alleged) honesty and earnestness precludes idiocy and error?
Please be as thorough as you can in your answer.
Thank you.
**************************
and, no: nothing you have posted in the interim has even vaguely touched on these questions.
I think it's fairly obvious that if the multitude of life forms morphed slowly over millions of years into different types that the fossils would show that in large numbers. Rather, the fossil record shows a multitude of complete life forms. Where are all of the slow transitions? Many scientists and even ones that used to believe toe know that they simply aren't there. I have an article of various museum directors that admit that also which I could send to you. I believe that the thousands of creation scientists are not prone to error and idiocy because my research and common sense verifies what they see. It really is pretty evident. I mean if you look at the incredible dna code that is more complex than a computer code and actually has a specific numbering system; it is amazing evidence for a designer. You would never say that your computer codes could have developed by themselves over millions of years. It seems like someone in your past pushed God on you or something bad like that so you are rejecting the evidence and your darkside is giving you bad science to try and back that up.