A common feature of AiG/ICR-type "misstatements" is the pretense that the "Lucy" specimen stands alone as the sole basis for all inferences. This confusion probably arises because you can fool more suckers that way.
How much does that little honey of a video sell for?
...just a little addition to your weekly tithe, that's all it takes. You, too, can debunk well established science!
Suckers, indeed.
Amazing what you can do with plaster of paris; you can even get Algore to look human. How's that movie of his doing? I here it has all sorts of reliable evidence in it, just like Evolution. Than again, Evo's are gullible.