Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lucy: Clearcut Case of Evolutionist Fraud
Answers in Genesis ^ | 2003 | Dr. David Menton, Brown Univ.

Posted on 06/18/2006 7:59:34 AM PDT by tomzz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 last
To: Mazda3Fan; SaveUS
hell might be a blessing....
NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!on into infinity
Fire, smoke, brimstone, worms that do not die, gnashing of teeth, no hope of ever, ever, ever getting out, and worst of all, separation from God Himself (this will be the worst as you were created for Him) and therefore ALL that is good. Also, the knowlege that you contributed to others including love ones being there somewhere in the blackness of burning hell.
181 posted on 11/27/2006 1:32:06 AM PST by Bellflower (A Brand New Day Is Coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

HEY, NOW....

Let’s not insult the chimps.


182 posted on 08/04/2010 2:29:49 PM PDT by KnightofMotley (Veritas vel ad nex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Deadshot Drifter

To me, one of the biggest flaws in your logic is your finding that the similarity in structure to an ostrich bone is proof that it is evolved from one. It could also be proof that it wasn’t properly identified in the first place.

Looking more closely at the genetic code is the core issue... people want to defend evolution to the exclusion of common sense, even if all you do is strip everything down to basic DNA.

I suppose that you consider it to be more intelligent to find that you have evolved from primordial goo to have the distinct DNA that you do, and that every living creature that exists with its own distinct DNA pattern evolved from that same primordial goo.

Yes, and you find the flawed findings of Lucy’s fossils to be your smoking gun. Where are the rest? Surely with the billions of steps between primordial goo and every other living creature, the intermediary creatures - all of them - must be somewhere.

And if Darwin, who actually already believed in evolution before he went to the Galapagos Islands, truly discovered a principle upon which to base science for all eternity, why didn’t Robert FitzRoy, who was examining the exact same ecological evidence at the same time, arrive at the same conclusions?

Evolutionists refuse to consider that their methods of dating could be wrong, despite evidence to the contrary. They refuse to understand that you can’t make something out of nothing, although quantum physics can lead them there.

Yes, we do have a Divine Creator, but no, we’ve never been an accident.


183 posted on 02/11/2011 9:37:13 AM PST by thinking freely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson