To: PatrickHenry
Well said.
However I would like to see the very mistaken claim that Darwinism (whatever that happens to be) is separate from the science of evolution and is nothing more than a religion, addressed.
Although the many who describe Darwinism as a religion attempt to separate this imaginary philosophical position from the sciences it is quite apparent that they have a decidedly anti-science lean. It would be helpful to enumerate the many tactics used in the attempts to divorce the (many) evolutionary sciences which contribute to the SToE from 'True(TM)' science.
15 posted on
06/10/2006 5:07:10 PM PDT by
b_sharp
To: b_sharp
Although the many who describe Darwinism as a religion attempt to separate this imaginary philosophical position from the sciences it is quite apparent that they have a decidedly anti-science lean. If evolution is a religion, what are geology, biology, zoology and all the other sciences? Denominations?
No wonder inter-departmental battles are so nasty!
19 posted on
06/10/2006 5:11:31 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death--Heinlein)
To: b_sharp
It would be helpful to enumerate the many tactics used in the attempts to divorce the (many) evolutionary sciences which contribute to the SToE from 'True(TM)' science. I guess that's a good topic for another vanity thread.
20 posted on
06/10/2006 5:13:54 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson