Replies

Like I say, all of the news wires had versions of that story a year or so ago when it surfaced, and what I have posted is the url for the Reuters version of it on MSNBC. If you think Bill Gates and MSNBC and Reuters are perpetrating a fraud on the public, you need to call them up and inform them of it.

The material in the picture is what it is. There's no way in hell you can apply any sort of chemical treatment to 65 million year old materials and derive anything which looks like that.

"The material in the picture is what it is."

And that means it is not meat.

"There's no way in hell you can apply any sort of chemical treatment to 65 million year old materials and derive anything which looks like that."

So, you have evidence that everybody involved, researchers, reporters, EVERYBODY is lying? Where do you get this magic info that nobody else has?

Again for the lurkers, the picture in question shows a 3mm in diameter piece of the inside of a fossil that under chemical treatment became soft. It has (possibly) the remnants of blood in it, though no blood cells were found nor any DNA, and most certainly no meat. Meat is muscle. Again, the area in question is 3mm in diameter.

ROFLMAO You are looking at B.S. I seem to remember Jack Horner finding the major discovery of a dinosaur heart, complete with liquid blood! What he had was some sandstone with some iron in it. Hardly a heart. Just the fact that it was found in Sandstone should have set of the warning signals. Sandstone is porous. And the articles you are talking about are from March 2005. They should have had time to get some DNA by now. Or by some miracle, did the soft tissue stay, and all the DNA ran off? You are looking at a scam perpetrated by a creationist trying to get attention. Seems like they could have at least said they found the T-Rex in clay, or a bog, or something other than sandstone. Oh well, stupid is as stupid does I guess. EVEN FUNNIER is that this "scientist" compared the T-Rex material to ostriches because that is the T-Rex's closest relative. Closest by Evolution? ROFLMAO So, evolution is a big lie, unless we can find dinosaur meat only a few thousand years old. Then we can claim that the T-Rex evolved into an ostrich over the last few thousand years, and then there must be a God. Just Dang.
And remember for future reference, these media outlets are the same people who bring you news Dan Rather style. They are lost as last years Easter Eggs 99 percent of the time.