"MM, the judges are criminals. They are homicidal judicial activists. If you don't get it, then you evidently are a proponent of murdering disabled people. TERRI WAS MURDERED."
That is your opinion. Criminals, for me, are defined by their conviction of a crime in a court of law. You, apparently, have a different definition.
You seem to have lost touch with common sense on this issue. You have an opinion, and that's fine. I have a different opinion.
As for murdering disabled people, I'm certainly not in favor of that. I am, however, never opposed to letting the dying die a natural death. As I said, I'm in that situation right now with my father-in-law. I imagine that he could live another year or two with a feeding tube and numerous hospital visits. He does not want that, and wishes for his life to be over.
To that end, he is refusing food and water. Should we shove a feeding tube down his throat? I don't think so. It is his choice to die without intervention. His family is honoring his wishes, which he expresses quite clearly.
I have just a sneaking suspicion that you would not approve of that. And there it is. I hope you make your wishes clear to your relatives, telling them that you want to be kept alive no matter what. Write it down in proper legal format. Then, when you are debilitated so you can no longer speak or otherwise let people know that you have changed your mind, they will continue to maintain your life, no matter what.
Terri's case is one for the legal system to sort out. It has sorted it out. I think you're fighting a hopeless, and senseless battle in this, but that's your right.
The judges are part of the culture of death - I don't know how they hooked up with the death lobby but oops, they did it.
Terri was murdered for Derek Humphrey's, George Soros',Fla Right to Die, for the ACLU, the Atheists of Florida, Hostage Woodside, the American Bar Assn.,Pinellas Cty Sheriff Rice, Senator Jim King, ERGO, et al, and for Michael Schiavo.
Natural death vs. murder. Push 1 for natural death and 2 for murder.
Many terminal patients lose their appetite. That is completely different than taking the lives of disabled Americans after robbing them of their rehabilitation monies.
Judge George Greer and the other judges are criminals and it's not my opinion. Killing Terri was a big conspiracy for the euthanasia agenda. I can't connect thet dots for you here in one post but it was a massive effort.
Many people would have landed in jail if Terri was allowed to live. So, they killed her.
Pinellas County is now known as "Death Central." People bring their relative to Pinellas County to get "rid of" them because they can. Some pay ransom to their children so their own children won't have them killed in a hospice or hospital.
THIS IS THE REALITY. It sounds impossible but it is true. Seniors held hostage unless they pay their children to let them live.
It is dangerous for me, not senseless to keep telling the truth, and that I will continue to do.
What is the nature of your father-in-law's ailment? If it is something like cancer and the prognosis would be poor even with treatment, I would in no way begrudge a decision to forgo chemo with the intention of being able to live better for the remainder of his life (even if his life ended up being shorter as a result). I'd infer, though, that his ailment is something else. What is it?