I am supposing you are taking a fair look.
It is one sided if one supposes one side is fact and the other side is fiction. If that is the case, it is biased on the side of facts and evidence. That evidence is readily available through such sources and the Cheryl Ford, RN, book OurFight4Terri which is a compendium of paper trails reflecting the logic train the audio follows.
I really don't care to hear debates between fact and fiction, any more than to hear the devil's side at church to make it fair and balanced. Any debates at this point over the events which took place covering the fifteen year period have settled into the two camps, events supported by unbiased evidence, documents, medical and legal opinion opposing that fantasy developed by a sociopath and his team of supporters cheering on from the death culture.
The events of fifteen years ago were filed by LE at the time as cold case possible attempted homicide. One day that may be reopened with the motives of their attorneys, bioethicists and judges laid bare. I hope so.
Someone intentionally put Terri on that march to death and one day, justice on earth may still be served.
I wish you well on your search and that it cuts through the fog laid down by the MSM and the lovers of death.
As I said, I am interested in hearing an intelligent debate between people on both sides of the issue. I am actually very neutral on the issue since I don't really care one way or the other. What does completely turn me off is the rhetoric involved. It doesn't matter how right, or wrong, anyone is when I start hearing emotionally charged buzzwords such as "death culture", "lovers of death", etc... repeated ad infinitum. All that does is turn someone away who might otherwise be willing to listen. If the facts really are on your side, there is no need to resort to those types of scare tactics.