My original "argument was 2 questions that were never sufficiently answered:
1) Was there oxygen, water, and, or UVs when life began here on Earth?
2) How could it begin with, or without, these conditions?
After that -- I would be interested in what you have to show us about that textbook, and why it is relevant to this discussion.
You don't think it odd that an anti-Biblical book would have racism as its theme? Also, what do you think has caused more death in this world, Atheism or Christianity?
If you think these last 2 questions are off topic, don't bother answering.
In the mean time, I'll look at your first dissertation (post #456) and give you a ping later.
<< You don't think it odd that an anti-Biblical book would have racism as its theme? >>
You said this was the science text-book used in the Dayton school -- right? Why would you call that book anti-biblical?
And I don't think it odd that ANY book written in the 1920s included racism in it. Much of our culture did at that time. Google "Jim Crow."
<< My original "argument was 2 questions that were never sufficiently answered: >>
Post #437 contains an assertion -- not a question. Please provide the evidence for that assertion.
Untrue.