Well, if either one of them said that the appearance of the unborn child's appendages at a particular stage of growth prove evolution, they'd be just as looney as these evolutionists. (Neither one ever said such a silly thing.)
<< Well, if either one of them said that the appearance of the unborn child's appendages at a particular stage of growth prove evolution, they'd be just as looney as these evolutionists. (Neither one ever said such a silly thing.) >>
And neither did the article. But don't let that stop you from inserting the rest of your leg into your mouth. Science doesn't "prove" theories -- it either succeeds or fails in "disproving" them.